Well put, David. I quote you here: "But the more individuals write and discuss TROM in their own words the better." That happens for me the more I actually do the practices.
Take RI, for example. For example, in my Facebook group I call RI, "Creative Visualization", and it is the same practice Dennis gives, just a term they have heard of before. It helps them remove mental drama re pain.
For example, with certain groups I use the term "re-framing" (360 of course) instead of "Repair of Importances". Re-framing of a timebroken scene was mainly Lester Levenson's repair practice. Lester had prior to his release many sessions with a psychiatrist - who finally gave up on him, lol.
Buddhist groups have a near-equivalent repair practice called "lovingkindness". I would just add that they do a 360 on that.
Ramana Maharshi meditated and did a lot of perceptual RI walking around and around his beloved mountain. Others may follow his example without really knowing the true "why" - just that they feel better. I don't know if that is something Ramana intuitively did or if it was a standard exercise in his religion.
Christians were instructed to take an attitude of thankfulness, and I can personally attest that this also pushes the non-life mental dramatizations away, satiates the mind - at least temporarily. Would that be a repair or a process? Other than that I don't plainly see what the Christian equivalent of RI would be

In "Problems of Work", Hubbard gave us the walking practice, which sounds like a watered-down version of perceptual RI. I read in a book that Australian aboriginals made their mentally ill do what they called a "walk-about". My Freezone auditor also gave me a rudimentary RI, called "Six Directions", and we used it to keep the session moving along. it was a revelation for me to see that I could actually move a scene around - be more causative

I think "Time Breaking" would be an okay term to bandy about and even turn into a [hashtag] meme

It would be good for people to know that scenes are locational - near or far - until they are vanished.
Thanks for offering this little game! 
I hesitated between the second and third alternatives. Dennis’ materials are the real thing: ‘source’ if you will, and he doesn’t use a lot of scientology terms. I wouldn’t want to write anything that leads anyone away from the original materials. But the more individuals write and discuss TROM in their own words the better. We all have different cultural viewpoints, and can see different applications of the fundamental ideas.
The real difficulty is that TROM points the way out of game conditions. And not many people want that. LRH said that you can only get a person to give up a game if you offer them another game.
It’s easier to get people to accept stories of eight-armed deities, galactic dictators or guardians of the 12 gates of the underworld, than to give them the few simple facts that underlie any world they create. It’s easy to sell a complex system that promises more games sensation, helps athletes win medals, helps businessmen make money. Games are sexy; TROM isn’t. So it may always be valued only by people who have tried other systems and found these only provide partial answers.