Hello, there
John G. gave his stellar work over to Mike Goldstein and Mike sells a $5k course, and calls it Idenics. Basically, it is taking on the client's "must resolve" importance, bringing up an incident, running off some charge, and then asking about first the postulates before the incident (how the person was being - usually less restricted); then during the incident; then after the incident. This helps the client re-assess the before, during and after postulates and get them unstuck from the psyche, and the person can return to being once again what they were before the incident in the scene; sometimes even before that.
Because of the emphasis on getting right at the postulates asap, this piece of tech complements TROM because trom is also all about getting at the postulates, starting with Level Four. The client needs to know that clearing the postulates is the senior importance, not who did what to who, but knowing and taking responsibility for their postulates. That was what I personally got out of it when it was run on me. It can be run on yourself solo, especially because you know about RI and Level Two, and the Prime To Know Postulates, plus all the junior goals.
I don't use it anymore because I want to test out Trom without any additives, and I like simple tech.
John G. also included a type of havingness practice - very smart to do that. I wish John and Dennis had met each other and shared notes.
John's main case limitation that is apparent in his lectures, was that he had a "must not control" - probably due to all the manipulation and domination he experienced as an auditor in the Church of Scientology. Probably or possibly an IP state too... messed up on "control".
If you want John's patter sheet and instructions you may message me.