Author Topic: Compulsive games postulates pic. "Conflicting postulates"  (Read 424 times)

Cory

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 93
  • Karma: +7/-0
    • View Profile
Compulsive games postulates pic. "Conflicting postulates"
« on: February 20, 2014, 02:37:35 pm »
Hey everyone, I made this to show postulates that are conflicting. I think it makes it easier to understand in this form.

Conflicting postulates are:

 ;D  Must be known         VS    Must not know        >:(
 >:( Must not be known   VS    Must know               ;D
 ;D  Must know               VS    Must not be known  >:(
 >:( Must not know         VS    Must be known         ;D

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Karalee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
  • Karma: +18/-0
  • Administrator FB Group, "Informed Dryfasting"
  • Location: California, USA
    • View Profile
    • TROM Books available here:
The electric spark is representative of sensation?

Cory

  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 93
  • Karma: +7/-0
    • View Profile
Yes or the result of opposition. Like when you try and jump start a car battery and connect the wrong terminals you get a spark or a repulsion. But when you connect the right battery terminals, the energy flows, or you get attraction, but that's not shown in this one, it's shown in the next one I gotta make.

Does it make sense?
« Last Edit: February 20, 2014, 06:17:47 pm by Spirit neutral »
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Khepri

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • Location: UK
    • View Profile
    • TROM World
Nice one Cory - I was looking at creating some visual images to aid in my comprehension. Especially with respect to the flow around the legs and where one cannot move to a failed PD.

Here are some graphics!

Leg 1 - Must Be Known
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Leg 2 - Must Not Be Known
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Leg 3 - Must Know
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Leg 4 - Must Not Know
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 02:23:26 pm by mjh »

Khepri

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • Location: UK
    • View Profile
    • TROM World
All Legs and their flow lines
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 02:11:03 pm by mjh »

guest62

  • Guest
The being at (1) is in opposition to (4), whom he is endeavoring to convince that the effect should be known; (4) on the other hand, is doing a ‘Mustn’t Know’ on the effect, and his PD postulate is ‘Mustn’t be Known’ but he's overwhelmed.

1( randall ) is at the origin and 4 is at the receipt

enjoy hahaha

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3ubiry

Karalee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
  • Karma: +18/-0
  • Administrator FB Group, "Informed Dryfasting"
  • Location: California, USA
    • View Profile
    • TROM Books available here:
Dennis helped me so much in my interactions with others - just observing these postulates in myself and others.


Hey everyone, I made this to show postulates that are conflicting. I think it makes it easier to understand in this form.

Conflicting postulates are:

 ;D  Must be known         VS    Must not know        >:(
 >:( Must not be known   VS    Must know               ;D
 ;D  Must know               VS    Must not be known  >:(
 >:( Must not know         VS    Must be known         ;D