Home
Search
Login
Register1
Case studies / Synchronicity
« on: July 12, 2025, 07:05:41 pm »
Has anyone on here any stories of extrordinary synchronous occurences or cognitions while running TROM or other processes?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Other technology about the mind / Free Scientology Library Books
« on: June 01, 2025, 10:58:12 pm »
Hi I have about 35 Scientology books from the 80s if anybody would like them. I live in Qld. Australia and if you want to pay the postage I can send them anywhere you like. The are mostly hardback books and a few course packs and one red vol 65 -69. All original LRH before the takeover.
3
Trom Graphs and Pictures / Re: PFCC LIKE YOU'VE NEVER SEEN IT BEFORE
« on: February 22, 2025, 09:37:23 pm »
Great work TROMFAN, that's good how you have set it out. Its sure makes it easier to understand, well done. Cheers!
4
General Discussion / Is there anybody out there?
« on: December 16, 2024, 05:16:58 am »
Just nod if you can hear me 
5
General Discussion / Any Tromers in Australia
« on: May 30, 2024, 04:12:18 pm »
Hi Tromers,
Anyone living in Australia? I live in Queensland on the Gold Coast. Not far from Redland Bay actually. Be good to catch up and say Good'ay to other Tromers in the real world.
Ciao
Anyone living in Australia? I live in Queensland on the Gold Coast. Not far from Redland Bay actually. Be good to catch up and say Good'ay to other Tromers in the real world.
Ciao
6
General Discussion / Re: Couple of Questions
« on: November 04, 2023, 04:20:16 am »
Thanks for your reply TromFan.
Yes you are right if you get case gain its a valid outcome, that's what its all about hey.
I found I was a bit out gradient on 5A as even when running RI I get incidents coming in forcing on my attention. I returned to doing level 2.
I've seen the channel its good, looking a lot better now much more professional, well done.
Thanks for the offer I'll keep in touch, cheers.
Yes I believe it is Vistaril, a psych drug just a spelling error.
Yes you are right if you get case gain its a valid outcome, that's what its all about hey.
I found I was a bit out gradient on 5A as even when running RI I get incidents coming in forcing on my attention. I returned to doing level 2.
I've seen the channel its good, looking a lot better now much more professional, well done.
Thanks for the offer I'll keep in touch, cheers.
Yes I believe it is Vistaril, a psych drug just a spelling error.
7
General Discussion / Couple of Questions
« on: October 22, 2023, 08:27:42 am »
Hi Thanks for letting me join the forum, cheers.
Just to begin I have never seen any mental process rip TA like TROM Level 5A, its ruthless. So there is no debate whatsoever on the efficacy of DHS' discoveries.
I just have noticed some odd discrepancies that make me wonder what was going on personally for him.
Dennis writes that the ability to rectify problems with any body part or function up to the point of making the body "immortal" is possible on completing the ROM.
Yet he states many times on the tapes that his eyesight is so bad that he could not see the meter or PC's indicators so gave up auditing.
Why didn't he apply the necessary processes?
Dennis talks about LRH being paranoid for the opinion there were "Psychs" aligned against Scn. Yet himself states how when he was in Sydney the Melbourne inquiry was run and the Australian press was against Scn to the point that in Dennis' words "you couldn't advertise Scn" to get PCs. The FBI had raided the Church and the emeter was branded an illegal medical device. By 1994 when that tape was made Hubbard had been dispatched with his ass shot full of Vistorol, Meade Emory ex deputy commissioner of the IRS was one of the Directors of the Church of Spiritual Technology that owns the tech and little Hitler had full control to alter it as he wished.
Pretty hard evidence that the FDA, FBI, and a host of other goons were, and had been for many years, aligned against a workable spiritual / mental tech that could produce any number of Ingo Swans if left to flourish. I'm sure Dennis was aware that LRH's suspicions were well founded, he did in fact withdraw permission for those earlier statements to be published so maybe he had changed his opinion.
Is there someone here that knew him personally and has an answer?
Thanks again, cheers.
Just to begin I have never seen any mental process rip TA like TROM Level 5A, its ruthless. So there is no debate whatsoever on the efficacy of DHS' discoveries.
I just have noticed some odd discrepancies that make me wonder what was going on personally for him.
Dennis writes that the ability to rectify problems with any body part or function up to the point of making the body "immortal" is possible on completing the ROM.
Yet he states many times on the tapes that his eyesight is so bad that he could not see the meter or PC's indicators so gave up auditing.
Why didn't he apply the necessary processes?
Dennis talks about LRH being paranoid for the opinion there were "Psychs" aligned against Scn. Yet himself states how when he was in Sydney the Melbourne inquiry was run and the Australian press was against Scn to the point that in Dennis' words "you couldn't advertise Scn" to get PCs. The FBI had raided the Church and the emeter was branded an illegal medical device. By 1994 when that tape was made Hubbard had been dispatched with his ass shot full of Vistorol, Meade Emory ex deputy commissioner of the IRS was one of the Directors of the Church of Spiritual Technology that owns the tech and little Hitler had full control to alter it as he wished.
Pretty hard evidence that the FDA, FBI, and a host of other goons were, and had been for many years, aligned against a workable spiritual / mental tech that could produce any number of Ingo Swans if left to flourish. I'm sure Dennis was aware that LRH's suspicions were well founded, he did in fact withdraw permission for those earlier statements to be published so maybe he had changed his opinion.
Is there someone here that knew him personally and has an answer?
Thanks again, cheers.
Pages: [1]